USPTO serial 77293322
Serial No. 77293322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4359379Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2013
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77293322?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
TRISHA A. DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 702VANCOUVER; BRITISH COLUMB, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |