Drawing for JOHAN LINDEBERG

USPTO serial 77293910

JOHAN LINDEBERG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOHAN LINDEBERG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; computers; personal digital assistants (palmtops); mobile phone covers; optical articles and parts and accessories thereto, namely, optical glass lens, optical glass lenses, spectacles, sunglasses, spectacle frames, spectacle settings, namely, eye glass frames, spectacle cases, spectacle glasses, spectacle chains, spectacle cords, namely, neck cords which restrain movement of eyewear on a wearerACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, suits, jackets, sweatshirts, underwear; footwear, headwearACTIVE—
035advertising and publicity services; business management; business administration and office functions; retail services, namely, stores featuring clothing, footwear, headwear, optical articles, soaps, perfumery, cosmetics, jewelry, bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 16, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 14, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 14, 2008GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 14, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 4, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance