USPTO serial 77293975
MAGNETIC MECHANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNETIC MECHANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald Gowan
Gerald A. Gowan Gowan Intellectual Property627 Lyons LaneSuite 204Oakville, Ontario, L6J5Z7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetic device, namely, a magnet in a holder that attaches to attaches to automotive, marine or commercial vehicle filters for use in collecting and removing magnetic engine debris; magnetic device, namely, a magnet in a holder that attaches to engine oil filters for use in collecting and removing magnetic engine debris | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |