USPTO serial 77294124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dermot M. Sheridan
DERMOT M. SHERIDAN EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES, LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0808UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; gaslamps; gas mantles; lampshades; lampshade holders; lamp hanging supports; lamp casings; lamp reflectors; lamp glasses; porcelain oil lamps; oil lamps; Chinese lanterns; kerosene lamps; flares; street lamps; safety lamps for underground use; germicidal lamps for purifying air; neon lamps; lanterns; dynamo lamps; discharge lamps and their fittings; incandescent lamps; incandescent lamps and their fittings; ultraviolet ray lamps not for medical purposes; germicidal lamps; chandeliers; water surface lamps; mercury lamps; aquarium lights; spotlights; arc lamps; safety lamps; diving lights; fairy lights for festive decoration; infrared lamps; torches for lighting; fish gathering lamps; ceiling lights; fairy lights for festive decoaration lights; electric lamps for Christmas trees; standard lamps; searchlights; artificial solar lamps; floodlights; fluorescent lamps; pocket searchlights | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |