USPTO serial 77294432
SIMPLEFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081602Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMPLEFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Albright
Jeffrey H. Albright Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 Third Street NW, Suite 1950Albuquerque, NM 87102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bill payment services; Credit card payment processing services; Credit card services; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card verification; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic credit card transactions; Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Providing cash and other rebates for credit card use as part of a customer loyalty program; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Providing financial risk management services for electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLEFY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Borges, Julie
- Other trademarks owned by Borges, Julie
- Other trademarks owned by Borges, Julie
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SIMPLEFY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | RGTR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |