USPTO serial 77294837
EPTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
Peter J. Riebling Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP2900 K Street, N.W.Suite 200Washington, DC 20007-5118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cost and price analysis and business research services for industry in fields of combustion technology and energy research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis and research services for industry in the fields of combustion technology and energy research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific investigation into alternative fuels, and research and design of fuels, alternative fuels, aviation fuels, lubricants, combustion engines, relating thereto, all in the fields of combustion technology and energy research; industrial chemical analysis and research services in the fields of combustion technology and energy research; design and development of computer hardware and software in the fields of combustion technology and energy research; computer software design, namely, computer modelling in the fields of combustion technology and energy research; computer modelling, namely, atmospheric spray characterisation, lubricant thermal stability modelling, chemical modelling of combustion; testing services, namely, the testing of materials, the testing of fuels and alternative fuels, ignition and flammability limit testing, combustor emissions materials compatibility testing, in the fields of combustion technology and energy research; consultancy and advisory services in the fields of combustion technology and energy research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University of Sheffield
- Other trademarks owned by University of Sheffield
- Other trademarks owned by University of Sheffield
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EPTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |