Drawing for MICON

USPTO serial 77297180

MICON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARTZOG, WOODROW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Musical games; toy musical instruments; battery operated action toys; electronic action toys, electronic learning toys, mechanical action toys, radio transmitters for use with radio-controlled toys, remote control toys, namely robots, cars, airplanes, boats; tabletop units for playing electronic games in conjunction with a television or computer; toy mobiles; toy robots; battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 21, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 20, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance