CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DIGPLUS

USPTO serial 77297329

DIGPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

JOSEPH T. NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3590UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Assays and reagents for use in genetic research; fluorescent dyes for labeling nucleotides and proteins for scientific and research useACTIVE—
005Medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing body fluidsACTIVE—
042Scientific consultancy, research and design services relating to genetic and biological research; industrial research and analysis in the field of geneticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 12, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance