USPTO serial 77297475
GOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with GOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, GB
Temple, London, GB
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Barry
Jennifer L. Barry Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Wholesale distributorships featuring clothing and clothing accessories; retail store services featuring clothing and clothing accessories; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail websites of others; mail order catalog services featuring clothing and clothing accessories; ] Catalog ordering service featuring clothing and clothing accessories; online retail store services featuring clothing and clothing accessories; [ business consultancy, ] information [, and advisory ] services relating to all of the above services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goat Fashion Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Goat Fashion Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 1661, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Goat Fashion Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GOAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |