USPTO serial 77297929
SKINNY DIPPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKINNY DIPPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
Farmingdale, NY
Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
Farmingdale, NY
Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
Farmingdale, NY
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
1800 VEVEY, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flavored ices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Beverage Group, LTD
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SKINNY DIPPERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |