USPTO serial 77297975
BRAVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daryl W Schnurr
DARYL W SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVDSUITE 300WATERLOO, N2L6R5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | (Based on Intent to Use) Barbecue grills; Barbecues; Ceramic briquettes for use in barbecue grills; Gas grills; Grill accessories, namely, warming trays; Lava rock for use in barbecue grills; Lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candles(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Barbecue grills; Barbecues; Ceramic briquettes for use in barbecue grills; Gas grills; Grill accessories, namely, warming trays; Lava rock for use in barbecue grills; Lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |