USPTO serial 77300616
FRÜ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRÜ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas G. de la Torre
NICHOLAS G. DE LA TORRE BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP.O. BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Desserts, namely, fruit desserts, in the nature of cheesecakes, trifles, mousses and soufflés; chilled cream and dairy desserts, namely, cheesecakes; desserts made wholly or principally of dairy products or of milk products, namely, cheesecakes; flavored desserts, namely, flavored yogurt-based desserts, in the nature of mousses; prepared desserts, namely, fruit desserts, in the nature of cheesecakes, trifles, mousses and soufflés; frozen desserts, namely, frozen cheesecakes; frozen cream-based desserts in the nature of cheesecakes, trifles, mousses and soufflés, frozen yogurts; frozen fruit-based desserts in the nature of cheesecakes, trifles, mousses and soufflés; ice cream desserts, namely, ice cream sandwiches, ice cream bars, ice cream cakes; pudding desserts, namely, fruit-based pudding desserts; flavored desserts, namely, flavored yogurt-based desserts in the nature of frozen yogurt and fruit compotes; frozen desserts, namely, frozen cream based desserts in the nature of ice cream or ice cream substitutes and fruit compotes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOBLE DESSERTS HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Rensow Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Rensow Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRÜ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |