USPTO serial 77300762
ONEIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. McGuire
GEORGE R. MCGUIRE BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLCONE LINCOLN CENTERSYRACUSE, NY 13202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric coffee grinders; Grinders; Mixers; Electric food processors; Electric can openers; Electric food blenders; Electric knives; Electric food choppers; Juice extractors; Vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Can openers; Razors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric hair curling irons; Electric irons | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Massaging apparatus for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric toaster ovens; Electric toasters; Electric popcorn poppers; Electric waffle irons; Electric waffle maker; Electric griddles; Hot plates; Electric tea pots; Electric food steamer; Electric rice steamer; Electric vegetable steamer; Hair dryers; Electric fans | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Clocks incorporating radios | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Bathroom and shaving mirrors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Griddles; Cookware, namely, pots and pans; Hot pots; Rice cooking pots; Electric tooth brushes; Hair brushes; Toothbrushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oneida Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Oneida Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ONEIDA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |