USPTO serial 77301407
PRO CHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO CHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OMAHA, NE
OMAHA, NE
Automark Technical Systems, LLC
Chicago, IL
OMAHA, NE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY T. MORRIS, REG. NO. 42,017
NANCY T. MORRIS, REG. NO. 42,017 STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLPSTINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to ensure correct pronunciation of candidates names in the field of election management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ATS ACQUISITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ES&S AUTOMARK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Automark Technical Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ES&S AUTOMARK, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PRO CHECK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |