USPTO serial 77302810
MISSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2010
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MISSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EXETER, NH
EXETER, NH
Irvine, CA
Irvine, CA
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Hudgins
Christie Baty Hudgins Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER HOCKEY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER HOCKEY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mission Itech Hockey, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mission Itech Hockey, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mission Itech Hockey, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MISSION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |