USPTO serial 77303271
CAMP ROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAMP ROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Rupp
Brian Rupp The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetBurbank, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of motion picture films; production, presentation and distribution of radio programs; production of video recordings; production of live entertainment shows for use in the following media, namely, television, cable, satellite, audio and video media, video cartridges, laser discs, computer discs and by electronic means; providing entertainment services via a global communication network in the nature of online games and websites featuring a wide variety of general interest entertainment information relating to motion picture films, and other multimedia materials; amusement park and theme park services; entertainer services in the nature of live, television and movie appearances by a professional entertainer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |