USPTO serial 77303698
DIVENDOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVENDOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Przemyslaw Kozinski
BUKOWIECKA ST. 92, 03-893WARSAW,POLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Doors of metal, door frames of metal, cabanas of metal, protective gratings, fittings of metal for furniture, windows of metal, stairs of metal, bars, jalousies of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Wood panelling, building wood, doors not of metal, door frames not of metal, windows not of metal, flooring tiles, flooring parquet, stairs, window glass, terra cotta, wall tiles, jalousies not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, chairs, beds, tables, wardrobes, doors for furniture, garden furniture, picture frames, curtain rods | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings, carpets, mats, wall hangings not of textile, door mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Carpentry, furniture installation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Furniture design, interior design, consultancy in the field of interior decoration, furniture and interior design computer software development and design, computer programming, or maintenance of furniture and interior design computer software, design of computer programs and software relating to furniture and interior design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDECO S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIVENDOOR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |