USPTO serial 77304096
KKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA WELCH STEVENS
LISA WELCH STEVENS LISA WELCH STEVENS, ATTORNEY AT LAW P.C.1832 WOODMOOR DR STE 200MONUMENT, CO 80132-9094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, MEN'S, WOMEN'S, TEENS', CHILDREN'S AND INFANTS' HANDBAGS, WALLETS, TOTEBAGS, BRIEFCASES, SUITCASES, VALISES, LUGGAGE, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, DIAPER BAGS, AND TRAVELING BAGS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, WOMEN'S, MEN'S, TEENS', CHILDREN'S, AND INFANTS' PANTS; SHORTS; SHIRTS; SHOES; HATS; CAPS; HOODS; DRESSES; SKIRTS; T-SHIRTS; BABY BIBS NOT OF PAPER; ROMPERS; SLEEP SUITS; OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, JACKETS AND COATS; BOOTS; BOOTIES; FOOTWEAR; SOCKS; BELTS; SHIFTS; TIES; TOPS; AND ONE-PIECE CLOTHING FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |