Drawing for SNAPNOW

USPTO serial 77304118

SNAPNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAPNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. McCue

Michael J. McCue Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP3993 Howard Hughes ParkwaySte. 600Las Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, for capturing and sending images on a mobile device to an image database and for analyzing the captured images by electronically searching within an image database for a matchACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely, providing an online searchable image database accessible via mobile devices featuring consumer product information and consumer product images uploaded by vendors in order to make such information readily accessible to consumersACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing a website featuring a search engine for obtaining consumer product information and consumer product images from an online searchable database accessible via mobile devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2013GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 17, 2013GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 17, 2013CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 7, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance