USPTO serial 77304403
ZILLIONTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZILLIONTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
JEFFERSON F. SCHER CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303-3322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote controls for game consoles; gaming consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; mobile devices, namely, cell phones, vehicle entertainment systems, laptops, and palmtops; computer software enabling viewers to contribute content to web sites and communicate with one another about television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content while viewing them | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; dissemination of advertising for others via computer and communication networks; dissemination of advertising for others via inclusion with television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content; dissemination of television advertising based on viewer preference, viewer selection, and viewer behaviors; provision of advertisements personalized to the individual viewer, viewer preference, viewer selection, and viewer behaviors; promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites and e-commerce sites of others; promoting the goods and services of others by providing links from television programs and other televised content to the web sites and e-commerce sites of others; ecommerce services, namely, marketing of consumer products and services; facilitation of purchases via computer and communication networks; facilitation of purchases via viewer interaction with television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content displayed on a television, mobile device, or other network-connected display; providing hyperlinks to web sites of others featuring a wide variety of products and services for purchase, including consumer goods; providing direct purchase of products directly from television, and direct connection from television to vendors and brands, for a wide variety of products and services for purchase, including consumer goods; providing real time interactive polling of individuals through televisions, mobile devices, and networks in relation to television programs, motion picture films, advertisements, and other audiovisual and multimedia content; providing incentive award programs for viewers of television programs, motion picture films, advertisements, and other audiovisual and multimedia content; providing customer incentive award programs. providing incentive award programs for customers who purchase products and services via interaction with television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content displayed on a television, mobile device, or other network-connected display; providing redemption services enabling viewers to redeem incentive awards for products and services via interaction with television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content displayed on a television, mobile device, or other network-connected display | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | broadcasting of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content for viewing on gaming consoles and mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | syndication of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content via internet protocol and communication networks; distribution of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content for viewing on gaming consoles and mobile devices; syndication of television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content for viewing on televisions, computers, gaming consoles, and mobile devices; providing recommendations for individual viewers based on personal play lists and play lists suggested by friends, family and social networking | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software, web sites, and IP network-based services enabling viewers to contribute content to web sites and communicate with one another about television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content while viewing them; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software, web sites, and IP network-based services enabling viewers to search for, store, personalize, and recommend television programs, motion picture films, and other audiovisual and multimedia content; provision of web sites featuring owner originated content and third party and visitor contributed content in a wide variety of forms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZILLIONTV CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by XillianTV Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ZILLIONTV CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ZILLIONTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |