Drawing for JOE-X GUITARWORKS

USPTO serial 77304664

JOE-X GUITARWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOE-X GUITARWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit, Esq.

JOHN ALUMIT, ESQ. PATEL & ALUMIT, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436-1711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Bass guitars; Electric guitars; Guitar picks; Guitar strings; Guitars; Carrying cases for musical instruments; Tuners for musical instruments; Sound effect pedals for musical instrumentsACTIVEJul 2, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 12, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 11, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 23, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 23, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance