Drawing for ONBROADBAND NETWORKS

USPTO serial 77305866

ONBROADBAND NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONBROADBAND NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mallory Levitt

MALLORY LEVITT CBS LAW51 W 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable pre-recorded music and electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; downloadable motion pictures and television programs featuring comedy, musical, dramatic and reality television series, documentaries and sporting eventsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion pictures and television programs featuring comedy, musical, dramatic and reality television series, documentaries and sporting events for transmission via the internet, portable and wireless communication devices; providing a website featuring information in the field of entertainment rendered via the Internet, portable and wireless devices; entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable pre-recorded music and video featuring comedy, musical, dramatic and reality television series, documentaries and sporting events via a global computer network and wireless networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 12, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance