Drawing for PREPAREDNESSAGENT

USPTO serial 77306125

PREPAREDNESSAGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREPAREDNESSAGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary W. Glisson

Gary W. Glisson Stoel Rives LLP900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, generating alerts based on user-defined criteria; computer services, namely, generating alerts based on pattern recognition and identification of anomalies in databases and data setsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2009IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jul 13, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance