USPTO serial 77306382
QI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1545 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700One Peachtree PointeAtlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Blankets; Cashmere Blankets; Woolen Blankets; Spreads; Coverlets | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 025 | Sweaters; Crewneck Sweaters; Mock Turtleneck Sweaters; Turtleneck Sweaters; V-Neck Sweaters; Scarves; Head Scarves; Shoulder Scarves; Hats; Gloves; Outdoor Gloves; Gloves including those made of skin, hide or fur; Mittens; Layettes; Dresses; Skirts; Tops; Halter Tops; Tube Tops; Crop Tops; Rugby Tops; Tank Tops; Jeans; Sleepwear; Pants; Cargo Pants; Capri Pants; Lounge Pants; Track Pants; Sweat Pants; Hooded Sweat Shirts; Sweat Shirts; Pajamas; Pajama Bottoms; Knitted Caps; Socks; T-Shirts; Long Sleeved Shirts; Knit Shirts; Shirts; Head Bands; Infant and Toddler One-Piece clothing; Baby Bottoms; Baby Clothing; Suits; Men's Suits; Ladies' Suits; Bathing Suits; Shoes; Eat Muffs; Knitted Caps; Skull Caps; Golf Shirts; Golf Trousers; Golf Sweaters | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |