USPTO serial 77306475
Serial No. 77306475
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77306475?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoffman Estates, IL
Hoffman Estates, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Galis
Mark R. Galis Greenberg Traurig, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated tools and power-operated accessories therefore in the nature of gas-powered, electric-powered, battery-powered, or cordless-powered tools, namely, drills, hammer drills, impact wrenches, planers, circular saws, industrial tool grinders, bench saws, jig saws, chain saws, belts for machines, orbital sanders, rotary sanders, routers, electric generators, water well pumps, sump pumps, hydraulic jacks, portable drills and saws, portable hand sanders and polishers, air compressors and sprayers, and accessories for air compressors, namely, air-operated paint guns and airless paint sprayer; machine tools, namely, drill press, gear shapers, morse tapers, lathe, milling machines, planers, jointer, reamers, cylinder wall ridge expansion reamers, gear pullers, taper reamers, taps and dies, milling cutters, band saw blades, cylinder grinders, grinding wheels, counter sinks and counter bores, punches, riveters, tube cutters, pipe cutters, tinners' snips, shaping files, round shaping files, manual cutting tin snips | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, axes, chisels, files, hack saws, hand saws, hammers, hand hammers, hatchets, planes, pliers, adjustable end wrenches, adjustable socket wrenches, bit braces, cold chisels, hand wrenches, hack saw blades, hack saw frames, screwdrivers, trowels, twist drills, vises, wood chisels, ratchet wrenches, pipe threaders, fret saws, bow saws, woodsmen's saws, dado saws, band saws, non-wood axe, hammer and hatchet handles, work arbors and chucks, pipe wrenches, pinch and pry bars, coping saws, torque wrenches, putty knives, plasterers' trowels, post hole augers, nail sets, chalk line reel and line, circle cutters, stud removers, flaring tools and tubing sold therewith, gasket cutters, ring compressors, piston groove cutters, bushing driver tools, lever jaw wrenches, bolt cutters, mechanic's inspection mirrors, rubber mallets, file holders, brake spring pliers, spring spreaders, tie rod spreaders, mauls, utility knives and blades, steel cradle hammer and hatchet holders, sledges, splitting wedges, nail pullers and bars, mattocks, tote shovels; mechanics' hand tools, namely, socket wrenches, sockets, ratchet wrenches, spinner handles for socket wrenches, extension bars, combination wrenches, ignition wrenches, hex keys, hacksaws, universal joints, carpenter squares, tool holsters, key and tool ring holders, tool holders in the nature of work aprons, lug wrenches, spring clamps, drain augers, stud finders, bar clamps, and hand held airless and compressed air paint sprayers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants and jackets; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sears Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sears Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |