USPTO serial 77306583
LES AMBASSADEURS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LES AMBASSADEURS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Pritchard
J. MATTHEW PRITCHARD THE WEBB LAW FIRM700 KOPPERS BUILDING 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing casino facilities; gambling services; gaming, namely, casino gambling services; gaming machine entertainment services, namely, providing casino gambling machines for others; gaming services for entertainment purposes, namely, providing casino gambling machines for others; bingo hall services, namely, providing bingo games for others; club services, namely, providing concierge and recreation services for others; providing facilities for recreational activities; cabarets; betting on horses services; night clubs; night club services, namely, providing services relating to food, drink and dancing; cruise ship entertainment services; entertainment services relating to amusement machines, namely, providing arcade games for others; entertainer services, namely, magicians, musicians, singers, actors, comedians and public speakers; provision of entertainment facilities; providing non-downloadable on-line electronic publications, namely, electronic books and journals on-line about gaming; operating of lotteries; organization of sports competitions; non-downloadable Internet games; provision of electronic gaming, gambling and betting services transmitted via a global computer network such as the Internet; casino services, booking services, namely, making entertainment-related reservations for others; provision of information relating to sports, betting and gaming services accessible via a global computer network; arranging and conducting various athletic competitions and sports events; providing databases featuring sports, news and gaming; provision of gaming news and information over a global computer network such as the Internet; organizing and conducting lotteries; credit card betting; gambling, lottery or bookmaking services; electronic information relating to entertainment, on-line gaming and gambling, provided on-line from a computer database or via the Internet; information, advice and assistance relating to the aforementioned services; promotion and organization of live entertainment and poker tournaments; provision of entertainment information; entertainment in the nature of cable television and television gaming and sports shows; cable television and television show production; providing facilities for recreation activities; publication of non-downloadable online electronic publications, namely, magazines, newsletters, brochures and flyers in the field of sports and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |