USPTO serial 77306589
LES A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LES A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Pritchard
J. Matthew Pritchard IV The Webb Law Firm420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200Pittsburgh, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing casino facilities; gambling services; gaming, namely, casino gambling services; gaming machine entertainment services, namely, providing casino gambling machines for others; gaming services for entertainment purposes, namely, providing casino gambling machines for others; bingo hall services, namely, providing bingo games for others; club services, namely, providing concierge and recreation services for others; providing facilities for recreational activities; cabarets; betting on horses services; night clubs; night club services, namely, providing services relating to food, drink and dancing; cruise ship entertainment services; entertainment services relating to amusement machines, namely, providing arcade games for others; entertainer services, namely, magicians, musicians, singers, actors, comedians and public speakers; provision of entertainment facilities; providing non-downloadable on-line electronic publications, namely, electronic books and journals on-line about gaming; operating of lotteries; organization of sports competitions; non-downloadable Internet games; provision of electronic gaming, gambling and betting services transmitted via a global computer network such as the Internet; casino services, booking services, namely, making entertainment-related reservations for others; provision of information relating to sports, betting and gaming services accessible via a global computer network; arranging and conducting various athletic competitions and sports events; providing databases featuring sports, news and gaming; provision of gaming news and information over a global computer network such as the Internet; organizing and conducting lotteries; credit card betting; gambling, lottery or bookmaking services; electronic information relating to entertainment, on-line gaming and gambling, provided on-line from a computer database or via the Internet; information, advice and assistance relating to the aforementioned services; promotion and organization of live entertainment and poker tournaments; provision of entertainment information; entertainment in the nature of cable television and television gaming and sports shows; cable television and television show production; providing facilities for recreation activities; publication of non-downloadable online electronic publications, namely, magazines, newsletters, brochures and flyers in the field of sports and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |