USPTO serial 77306803
DK JUNGLECLIMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DK JUNGLECLIMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
REDMOND, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae
Jerald E. Nagae Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2800Seattle, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card game toys and their accessories, namely, trading card games; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; parts and fittings for hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; dolls; Go games; Japanese playing cards, also known as Utagaruta; Japanese chess, also known as Shogi games; dice; Japanese dice games, also known as Sugoroku; dice cups; Chinese checkers, also known as diamond game; chess games; checkers, namely, checker sets; magic tricks; dominoes; playing cards; Japanese playing cards known as Hanafuda; Mah-Jong; game machines and apparatus, namely, stand alone video game machines and LCD game machines; billiard equipment; coin-operated amusement machines; amusement game machines for use in amusement parks; arcade video game machines; action skill games; action type target games; arcade-type electronic video games; bath toys; board games; cases for play accessories; carrying cases for hand-held video game systems; coin-operated video games; collectable toy figures; costume masks; electric action toys; electronic game equipment with a watch function; electronic interactive board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; flying discs; hand-held pinball games; hand-held units for playing electronic games; hand-held units for playing electronic games in the nature of a virtual pet; hand-held units for playing video games; hand-held video game systems comprising hand-held units for playing video games and associated game cartridges or game memory cards packaged as a unit; inflatable toys; interactive board games; jacks; jigsaw puzzles; kites; manipulative games; manipulative puzzles; music box toys; musical toys; non-electric hand-held action skill games; paper dolls; parlor games; party favors in the nature of small toys; play figures; plush dolls; plush toys; positionable toy figures; promotional game cards; pull toys; punching toys; puppets; push toys; ride-on toys; role playing games; rubber action balls; rubber character toys; spinning tops; stand alone video game machines; stuffed toys; toy action balls; toy action figures; toy balloons; toy banks; toy binoculars; toy building blocks; toy cap pistols; toy carrying cases; toy clocks and watches; toy construction playsets; toy decorative wind socks; toy figurines; toy key chains with and without sound device; toy mobiles; toy musical instruments; toy punching bags; toy tea sets; toy vehicles; toy whistles; toys for pets; water squirting toys; wind-up toys; yo-yos; toys for domestic pets; sports equipment, namely, golf balls, in-line skates, jump ropes, roller skates, skateboards, snowboards, snow skis, sports balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DK JUNGLECLIMBER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |