USPTO serial 77307509
SCALABLE COMBAT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCALABLE COMBAT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer aided design for others; Computer code conversion for others; Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer graphics services; Computer hardware development; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer network design and computer software design for the military combat systems; Computer programming; Computer programming for others; Computer programming services; Computer project management services; Computer services, namely creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer systems analysis; Computer-aided engineering services for others; Conducting engineering surveys; Conducting of feasibility studies; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of information and data bases; Design, development and implementation of software; Designing of machines, apparatus, instruments or systems composed of such machines, apparatus and instruments; Development of new technology for others in the field of military combat systems; Development of software for secure network operations; Engineering; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the military combat systems; Research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of military combat systems; Scientific research and development | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |