USPTO serial 77307688
SYNOPSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNOPSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
BRYAN K. WHEELOCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.7700 BONHOMME AVE STE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-1932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MAGNETIC MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, CATHETERS, GUIDEWIRES, SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR TAKING TISSUE SAMPLES, AND ELECTRODES AND ELECTRODE CATHETERS; CATHETERS, ENDOSCOPES; MEDICAL GUIDEWIRES; ULTRASONIC APPARATUS FOR LOCATING MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE BODY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR TAKING TISSUE SAMPLES; MEDICAL ELECTRODES AND ELECTRODE CATHETERS; MEDICAL IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ELECTRONIC DISPLAY MONITORS FOR MEDICAL IMAGES FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER-ASSISTED REMOTELY AND LOCALLY CONTROLLED MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PROCEDURES; MEDICAL IMAGE NETWORKING APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE NETWORKING SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ELECTRONIC DISPLAY MONITORS FOR MEDICAL IMAGES FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER-ASSISTED REMOTELY AND LOCALLY CONTROLLED MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PROCEDURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |