Drawing for ZORRO GENERATION Z

USPTO serial 77307804

ZORRO GENERATION Z

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZORRO GENERATION Z?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Pandiscio

MARK J. PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02451-1933UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of animation; animation production servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 17, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 1, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance