USPTO serial 77308779
MODERN WOODMEN FRATERNAL FINANCIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODERN WOODMEN FRATERNAL FINANCIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J. MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LANE4TH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Fraternal services, namely, insurance underwriting for fraternal benefit organizations in the field of annuity contracts and life insurance; financial services, namely, financial analysis and consultation, financial administration of retirement plans, financial forecasting; banking, investment advisory and insurance agency services; life insurance brokerage and issuance of annuities and other financial services, namely, annuity underwriting, and financial advice | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |