USPTO serial 77309516
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerard T. Gallagher
GERARD T. GALLAGHER BARNES & THORNBURG LLP100 NORTH MICHIGAN600 1ST SOURCE BANK CENTERSOUTH BEND, IN 46601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chlorine compounds for maintaining drinking water supplies; Chemical compounds for use in cleaning and maintaining water softening units; Chemical compound for use in removing foreign matter from water softeners | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2006 |
| 003 | Cleaning preparation for use with washing machines for the purpose of removing scum, mineral deposits, and lime scale in washing machines during washing machine operation; Drain cleaner; Cleaning preparation for garbage disposals; All-purpose rust, iron stain and stain remover for use in toilet bowls, flush tanks, sinks and bowls, dishwashers and washing machines, and with dishes, plastic ware and glassware and like items; Stain removers for removing stains from brick, stone, concrete and other exterior surfaces; Stain removers for removing stains from tubs, chrome, ceramic tile, shower stalls, and the like; All-purpose rust removing preparations and iron stain remover for whitening, brightening and removing stains from clothing; Drain openers; Cleaner for removing hard water stains, rust stains and iron stains from clothing; All-purpose chemical cleaner for removing lime, rust, soap, and hard water stains; Cleaning preparation for use with dishwashers for the purpose of removing soap scum, mineral deposits, lime scale, and grease in dishwashers during dishwasher operation; General purpose cleaning preparations for preventing and removing mineral deposits; Cleaners for water treatment equipment and appliances, namely, commercial and industrial water softening equipment and household appliances, namely, ice makers, coffee makers, dishwashers, humidifiers and distillers; All-purpose rust and stain remover for use in water systems, namely, toilets, pipes, pumps, and water conditions | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2006 |
| 005 | Sanitizers for water treatment equipment and appliances, namely, commercial and industrial water softening equipment and household appliances, namely, ice makers, coffee makers, dishwashers, humidifiers and distillers; Household deodorant and disinfectant for garbage disposals; Chemical preparations to prevent mold, mildew, deposit and corrosion in whirlpool baths, hot tubs and jetted bathtubs | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |