Drawing for A TUS ORDENES

USPTO serial 77309572

A TUS ORDENES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A TUS ORDENES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth F. Janda

ELIZABETH F. JANDA BROOKS KUSHMAN P. C.1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the sale of goods and services of others in the automotive industry by dissemination of promotional materials and product information through an online global computer network, through the distribution of printed material, audio and video tapes, television and radio broadcasts, Internet web sites, and promotional contestsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 6, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 1, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 30, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance