Drawing for TAKE ME OUT TO THE BALLGAME

USPTO serial 77310109

TAKE ME OUT TO THE BALLGAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAKE ME OUT TO THE BALLGAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin, Esq.

MARY L. KEVLIN, ESQ. COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, tables, benches, stools, recliners, chairs, toy chests, bed frame headboards, booster seats, furniture chests, mirrors, window blinds, cabinets, chair pads, hampers, packaging containers made of plastic, cushions, pillows, sleeping bags, drinking straws, plastic license plates, plastic pet id tags, non-metal bottle caps, plastic key chain tags, non-metal and non-leather key chains, non-metal key fobs, non-metal key rings, non-metal key holders, decorative wall, floor and desk plaques, plaques of wood, plastic, resin or wax, decorative mobiles, picture frames, boxes of wood, plastic, resin or wax, non-metal mailboxes, storage racks for organizing clothes and sports equipment; non-metal lockers, polyresin tablets which look like stone and have words or designs on them, mirror frames, sofas, funerary urns, caskets, beds for pets, display racks and point of purchase displaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 5, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance