USPTO serial 77310273
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Washington
JOSEPH E. WASHINGTON MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2541UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | IMAGING SYSTEMS AND INSTRUMENTATION BASED ON RAMAN AND OTHER METHODS OF SPECTROSCOPY, NAMELY HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE NON-DESTRUCTIVE DETECTION, TESTING AND ANALYSES OF SOLID, LIQUID, AND CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS, IN TESTING AND ANALYSES OF SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS AND DEVICES, ELECTRONIC DISPLAY MATERIALS AND DEVICES, AND PHOTONIC MATERIALS AND DEVICES, IN ANALYSES OF CHEMICAL BONDING AND ATOMIC STRUCTURES OF MATERIALS, IN FORENSICS ANALYSIS, IN BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, IN CHEMICAL IMAGING, RAMAN IMAGING, FLUORESCENCE IMAGING, VISIBLE ABSORPTION IMAGING, BRIGHTFIELD TRANSMISSION IMAGING, BRIGHTFIELD REFLECTION IMAGING, AND CROSSED POLARIZATION IMAGING, AND IN ANTI-COUNTERFEITING APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |