USPTO serial 77310576
GOLDTOE MORETZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDTOE MORETZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Gayle Barber
MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S. TRYON STREETSUITE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | APPAREL, NAMELY, SOCKWEAR | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |