Drawing for SHOE DEPT. ENCORE

USPTO serial 77310667

SHOE DEPT. ENCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOE DEPT. ENCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis M. Pinckney

FRANCIS M. PINCKNEY KENNEDY COVINGTON LOBDELL & HICKMAN, LLP214 NORTH TRYON STREETHEARST TOWER, 47TH FLOORCHARLOTTE, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail shoe store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 20, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 22, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 8, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 24, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance