USPTO serial 77311059
HOMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Andrew Koziol
PETER ANDREW KOZIOL ASSOULINE & BERLOWE PA1801 N. Military TrailSuite 160Boca Raton, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FINANCIAL ENGINEERING SOFTWARE FOR INSTITUTIONS, ACCREDITED INVESTORS, GOVERNMENTS, HEDGE FUNDS, AND BANKERS TO MEASURE, PROCESS, ANALYZE, MANAGE, AND/OR TRANSACT SECURITIES, DERIVATIVES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL ENGINEERING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN FUNDS AND INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR INSTITUTIONS, ACCREDITED INVESTORS, GOVERNMENTS, AND BANKERS, NAMELY, FINANCIAL RISK ANALYSIS, FINANCIAL RISK CONSULTANCY, FINANCIAL INVESTMENT AND RISK INFORMATION, FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL RISK EVALUATION, STRUCTURED FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, AND FINANCIAL SECURITIES HEDGING, NAMELY, HEDGE FUND INVESTMENT SERVICES; FINANCIAL INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INVESTMENT MARKET VALUE EQUITY INSURANCE CONSULTANCY FOR INSTITUTIONS, ACCREDITED INVESTORS, GOVERNMENTS, HEDGE FUNDS, AND BANKERS; ASSET VALUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ASSET MARKET VALUE FINANCIAL RISK MITIGATION AND ASSET EQUITY INSURANCE CONSULTANCY FOR INSTITUTIONS, ACCREDITED INVESTORS, GOVERNMENTS, HEDGE FUNDS, AND BANKERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARKLEY INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by BARKLEY INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named HOMER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |