Drawing for AMERICAN LIVING CLOTHING & FURNISHINGS U.S QUALITY BRAND

USPTO serial 77311291

AMERICAN LIVING CLOTHING & FURNISHINGS U.S QUALITY BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN LIVING CLOTHING & FURNISHINGS U.S QUALITY BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Roxanne Elings, Esq.

G. Roxanne Elings Greenberg Traurig, LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Ceramic tissue box covers; ceramic casseroles, bakeware, cooking pots and pans; dinnerware; bathroom accessories, namely, toothbrush holders, soap dishes, tumblers, toilet tissue holders, waste baskets, lotion pump bottles sold empty, canister sets, trays not of precious metal, napkin rings not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 28, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 26, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance