USPTO serial 77311594
THE HELLFIRE CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HELLFIRE CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. FAGERHOLM, ESQ.
JOHN W. FAGERHOLM, ESQ. FAGERHOLM & JEFFERSON LAW CORPORATION3500 W OLIVE AVE FL 3BURBANK, CA 91505-4628UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Social club services, namely, arranging, organizing, and hosting social events, get-togethers, and parties for club members; Organizing sporting events, namely, team contact sports in the nature of basketball, football, soccer and hockey games; Educational services, namely, providing incentives to men to demonstrate excellence in the field of entrepreneurship; Educational services, namely, providing incentives to men to demonstrate excellence in the field of entrepreneurship through the issuance of awards; Organization of dancing events; Organizing community festivals featuring a variety of activities, namely sporting events, art exhibitions, flea markets, ethnic dances and the like; Organizing community festivals featuring a variety of activities, namely, art exhibitions, heritage markets, ethnic dances, and the like; Organizing community sporting and cultural events; Organizing exhibitions for men for cultural or educational purposes; Country clubs; Night clubs; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties for the purpose of dating and social introduction for adults; Publication of documents in the field of training, science, public law and social affairs; Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about men's issues accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ring tones, pre-recorded music, video and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing a radio program in the field of men's issues via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of men's issues via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; On-line library services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature newspapers, magazines, photographs and pictures via an on-line computer network; Programming on a global computer network; Publication of electronic newspapers accessible via a global computer network; Arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of dancing and comedy events; Dance events; Providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events and activities in the field of entertainment and education; Providing news in the nature of current event reporting; Providing various facilities for an array of sporting events, sports and athletic competitions and awards programs; Special event planning; Special event planning consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |