USPTO serial 77311653
EVRIHOLDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3719142Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2009
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVRIHOLDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anaheim, CA
ANAHEIM, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis C. Paul
Louis C. Paul Louis C. Paul & Associates, PLLC250 Park Avenue, 7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen and household gadgets, namely, plastic gadget consisting of [combination crumb-sweeper, cooking strainer, and food carrying tray, non-metal beverage pouring device that fits at the top of a bottle or container, pouring spouts for household use,] bottle openers, jar openers,[ gadget for holding tea bag in cup and squeezing it,] and sandwich shapers, namely, sandwich cutting molds designed to cut bread into fanciful shapes and to cut crusts from bread; non-metal clips for covering cut fruit and vegetables for storage;[ tea infusers not of precious metal;] gadget consisting of a combination scoop and measuring device; kitchen soap dispensers; [gadget consisting of combination of sponge brush and soap dispenser;] scouring sponges;[ gadget consisting of pot clip that hold cooking utensils on the rim of the pot;] gadget consisting of combination of fly swatter, non-electric carpet sweeper, dustpan, and tweezers; kitchenware, namely, sandwich boxes; non-metal cookware for use in a microwave, namely,[ cooking rack;] food storage containers,[ namely, bins, boxes; ]kitchen utensils, namely, spatula and serving spoon combination utensils; household utensils, namely, brooms, broom heads, dusters, and sweepers, namely, [non-electric carpet sweepers,] floor brushes and hand brushes with flexible rubber bristles to brush away hair, lint, dust, dirt and small particles and which can be used on pets, clothing, upholstery, and carpets;[ boot trees; shoe trees; ] slippers with microfiber soles for cleaning purposes; cleaning cloths; household cleaning pads; household gloves for general use;[ feather dusters;] carrying and organization caddies for household cleaning products; cleaning mitts of fabric; bathroom gadgets and utensils, namely,[ razor holders, ]toothbrush holders; containers of plastic for storage of feminine products for household or domestic use; squeegees for household use; personal care products, namely, bath and shower sponges | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVRIHOLDER PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EVRIHOLDER PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Evriholder Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Evriholder Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named EVRIHOLDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |