Drawing for EROS NETWORKS

USPTO serial 77312148

EROS NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EROS NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela Gavin

Pamela Gavin Gavin Law Offices, PLC2500 Gaskins Road, Suite BRichmond, VA 23238UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing information in the field of adult-themed entertainment via a global computer network; providing online publications, namely, a magazine and articles in the field of adult-themed entertainment via a global computer network; online journals, namely, blogs featuring subject matter in the field of adult-themed topics, products, services and entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance