USPTO serial 77312605
S.A.M.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S.A.M.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Malcolm L. Moore
MALCOLM L MOORE MOORE & HANSEN PLLP225 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 4850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | men's hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners and hairspray; men's body washes and body lotions; and men's cologne | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |