CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IPDX

USPTO serial 77312896

IPDX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPDX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew T. Latimer

Matthew T. Latimer Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific and educational instruments for medical and clinical diagnostic testing of samples, namely, measuring devices having computer elements, for measuring the presence or amount of nucleic acids, proteins, and other biological macromoleculesACTIVE—
042Providing reagent, sample, testing, and clinical and diagnostic testing services of samples for biological and biochemical materials for others in the fields of scienceACTIVE—
044Medical testing of samples for biological and biochemical materials; providing on-line medical record analysis services designed to provide patients with custom tailored information about the range of possible diagnoses and therapies associated with a defined set of symptoms; providing information in the field of medical diagnostic testing and personalized therapyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 30, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 28, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 2, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 27, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 13, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance