Drawing for RATCHET MAN

USPTO serial 77313446

RATCHET MAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RATCHET MAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy A. Flory

Timothy A. Flory GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP2851 Charlevoix Dr., S.E., Suite 207Grand Rapids, MI 49546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, ratchet wrenches designed to engage or grip an objectACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 26, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 26, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance