USPTO serial 77313825
ULTIMATE BATTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE BATTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina Ringel
NINA RINGEL THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, LLC5909 SEA OTTER PLCARLSBAD, CA 92010-6621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Trading cards; greeting cards; blank cards; note cards; gift cards; business cards; occasion cards; stickers; albums for stickers; bumper stickers; sticker books; appliqués in the form of decals; adhesive labels; printed paper labels; printed matter, namely, magazines in the field of entertainment and sports; books in the field of entertainment and sports; comic books; comic strips; cartoon prints; newspaper cartoons; coloring books; children's books; children's activity books; notebooks; composition books; book covers; scrapbooks; photo albums; binders; stationery; blank writing journals; posters; role playing game equipment in the nature of game book manuals; cardboard packaging; packaging, namely, blister cards; plastic or paper bags for packaging; postcards; desk calendars; desk pads and desk top organizers; bookmarks; calendars; pen cases; pencil cases; lunch bags; temporary body tattoos | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action skill games; Amusement game machines; Arcade games; Arcade-type electronic education video games; Arcade-type electronic video games; Basketball table top games; Billiard game playing equipment; Bingo game playing equipment; Board games; Card games; Coin-operated video games; Dice games; Disposable ticket sets for playing games of chance; Electronic dart games; Electronic educational game machines for children; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; Exercise machines incorporating electronic and video game controllers; Floor-standing units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Game equipment, namely, chips; Game tables; Gaming equipment, namely, game wheels; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; Hand held unit for playing video games; Hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; Horizontal pinball machine; Japanese dice games; Karuta playing cards (Japanese card game); LCD game machines; Manipulative games; Nets for ball games; Paddle ball games; Parlor games; Party games; Pinball-type games; Promotional game cards; Ring games; Role playing games; Stand alone video game machines; Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Trading card games; Baby multiple activity toys; Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Cases for toy structures; Toy vehicles and accessories therefore; Collectible toy vehicles; Diecast collectible toy vehicles; Cases for toy vehicles; Children's multiple activity toys; Children's wire construction and art activity toys; Collectible toy figures; Electric action toys; Electronic learning toys; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Fantasy character toys; Infant toys; Mechanical toys; Miniature toy helmets; Modeled toy figurines; toy figurines; Musical toys; Play mats for use with toy vehicles; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positional toy figures; Remote control toys; Sand toys; Rubber character toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed toy animals; Toy action figures; Toy animals and accessories; Toy boxes; Toy building blocks; Toy clocks and watches; Toy construction sets; Toy furniture; Toy masks; Toy model train sets; Toy model cars; Toy stamps; Wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Upper Deck Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Upper Deck Company
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ULTIMATE BATTLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |