USPTO serial 77314084
FIORINDA BY CARLO PIGNATELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4322493Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2013
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIORINDA BY CARLO PIGNATELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wedding gowns, suits, dresses, jackets, body stockings, socks, shirts, blouses, singlets, hats and caps, dress-coats, coats, skirts, gloves, raincoats, pullovers, cardigans, trousers, shawl, scarves, overcoats, women suits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlo Pignatelli S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlo Pignatelli S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlo Pignatelli S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FIORINDA BY CARLO PIGNATELLI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |