USPTO serial 77314212
INTEGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indianola, PA
Indianola, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Denesvich
Jill Denesvich Medrad, Inc.1 Medrad DriveIndianola, PA 15051-9759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical Fluid Delivery Systems for use in Administering Radiopharmaceuticals to Patients and Disposables for use Therewith, namely fluid path tubing sets and connectors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |