Drawing for NANOFLY

USPTO serial 77314234

NANOFLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOFLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith P. Rodden, Esquire

Judith P. Rodden, Esquire POZZUOLO RODDEN, P.C.2033 WALNUT STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012ParachutesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 7, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 7, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 7, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 9, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance